About Me

Prone to hyperbole. Self indulgent to a fault. Compulsive Liar. Inveterately Honest. Obviously Oxymoronic.

Sunday, July 30, 2017

Honor among thieves

(pic courtesy: Manorama Online)

ThOndimuthalum Dhriksaakshiyum, Dileesh Pothan’s second film and collaboration with Shyam Pushkaran, could not begin at a more appropriate place than the outskirts of Vaikkom. For no other recent filmmaker has come to embody the simple, yet rich humanism of Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer in his filmmaking than Dileesh Pothan. Every character that redeems himself or herself in the eyes of the audience does so because they eschew the power or safety of the systems and ties that bind them in favor of empathy. But we’ll get back that at a later point – let’s focus on the filmmaking for a bit.

Shortly after beginning in the verdant Thavanakkadavu, ThoNdimuthalum shifts to the hinterlands of the Kerala – Karnataka border. In and of itself this is an interesting choice for two reasons. The Malabar coast and its picturesque locales have traditionally been a stand in for the Kerala Karnataka border. But Dileesh clearly moves away from the coast into more arid territory – signaling a departure both from the usual choice of locale and from the lush photography that dominated Dileesh’s first outing Maheshinte Prathikaaram. The screen is filled with sepia or shiny black – both from the rocks that pepper the terrain or from the solar panels built atop them. The tone and color of everything we see serves as a constant reminder of how parched both the earth and the people are. But Rajeev Ravi reminds us that this milieu choice is in no way limiting in terms of capturing outstanding images – in particular a housefly hovering over a blade of glass (a scatological shot but stunning nevertheless) and a timelapse-type shot of night turning into dawn over an ‘ulsavapparambu’.

Apart from those flourishes however, the editing, music, and mise-en-scene rarely step out of the confines of the small world that Shyam Pushkaran, Sajeev Pazhoor and Dileesh create. And I use the word small purely as a spatial descriptor – in no way is its ambition or the reflection of the present day challenges of the region where the story is set 'small'. Consider if you will the party names that are fading away on the walls of the bus stop (not the typical Marxist symbols one would have seen in the past in the region) as A.S.I Chandran stops for a breather when chasing after the thief that has stolen the leading lady’s necklace or the color of the dhotis of the troublemakers at the temple festival. Consider how the economy of the locality which would typically be driven by the visitors to the temple (especially during the festival season) seems to be driven by the police station instead which seems to be positioned at a vantage point across the temple grounds. Even in this simple world filled with simple people driven by simple motivations (when a cop laughingly asks the thief if he swallowed the stolen chain because he was hungry he wryly responds “isn’t hunger ultimately responsible for everything?”) the entropy of it all infiltrates ThoNdimuthalum with a richness beyond compare. The actors portraying those simple motivations are all first rate - not just the Dileesh regulars (if one can say that for a 2 film director) like Fahadh or Alencier Lopez (as ASI Chandran) but also the new faces like Nimisha Sajayan (as Sreeja the leading lady) or Sibi Thomas (as SI Sajan) and some older yet unrecognized faces like Vettukili Prakash (as Sreeja’s father). Fahadh in particular is magnificent in action and word – exemplified by his introduction scene where he executes the chain theft followed by the scene where he describes the act with great relish. He plays the hitherto nameless thief as a puckish vector injecting the humanity Basheer infused into his stories into the lives of everyone he touches in the film.


Ultimately, a steadfast perspective on where humanity’s salvation lies is what elevates ThoNdimuthalum above any other films I’ve seen in the recent past. Humanity has always tried to build systems in an effort to work together, build community and achieve common goals. But all systems we build tend to have the same failing – they accrue power and in the end tend to redirect the human resources they’ve acquired into the sustenance of that power rather than serve the originally intentioned goals. Sreeja and Prasad in some ways are caught between the two such systems – caste and the law. Caste was not created so parents cause their daughter physical injury or disown her. And yet this and much worse continues to happen in our society – so when it happens to Sreeja it does not seem that far fetched. The Law was created to protect and serve innocents like Prasad and Sreeja. And yet, it is they who bear the economic and physical costs of ‘investigating’ the theft of which they were a victim. The film also recognizes that the system is not a monolith – it is after all made up of humans too. And using A.S.I Chandran as a stand in, we get to see how those that are inextricably a part of the system can redeem themselves too – by appealing to the humanity of the people they are to serve rather than by manipulating them. Laden with irony and quippy dialogs ThoNdimuthalum delivers such weighty considerations with an utter lack of self-consciousness that makes it extremely endearing. It will linger in your imaginations long after you’ve left the darkness of the screening room behind.

Friday, July 3, 2015

காக்கா முட்டை - தடைபட்ட வார்த்தைகள்

அருமையான படம். ஒரு திறமையான இயக்குனராக, கதை சொல்லியாக மணிகண்டன் தன்னை முதற்படத்திலேயே நிலைநாட்டியிருக்கும் காரணம் பார்வையாளரின் அறிவை ஓரளவுக்காவது மதிப்பதினால் மட்டுமே. "என்னதான் முட்டை வெள்ளையாக இருந்தாலும் உள்ளேயிருப்பது காக்க தானே" என்று கூறும் உலகிற்கு "காக்க-ன்னா மட்டும் கொறச்சலா?" என்று அதட்டலாக கேட்கும் குரல் தான் படத்தின் நேர்முகமான தோரணை. அனால் இதை விட என்னை கவர்ந்தது படத்தில் பகிரங்கமாக வெளிப்படாத குறிப்புகள். பணத்திற்கும் துட்டுக்கும் உள்ள வேறுபாடு. திடலுக்கும் பூங்காவிற்கும் உள்ள வேறுபாடு. பொருளாதரத்திற்க்கும் சமத்துவத்திற்கும் உள்ள வேறுபாடு.

நகரத்தின் நடுவில் பட்டா இடப்படதா நிலம். அதில் ஒரு மரம். அது அருகிலுருக்கும் குப்பத்து சிறுவர்களுக்கும் சிறுமிகளுக்கும் விளையாட்டுத் திடலாக திகழ்கிறது. சுற்றுமுள்ள அடுக்குமாடி கட்டிடவாசிகளின் பிள்ளைகள் அங்கே விளையாடுகிறார்களா என்றால் இல்லை. அவர்களுக்கும் சறுக்கும், ஊஞ்சல்களும் நிறைந்த ஒரு தனி பூங்கா. உறக்கச் சொல்லாமலே "பூங்கா யாருக்காக கட்டப்பட்டது?" என்ற கேள்வி முன் நிற்கிரது. ஒரு கடை முதலாளி அதிகாரிகளையும் அரசியல்வாதிகளையும் கையில் போட்டுக்கொண்டு நிலம் வாங்குகையில் யாருடைய "இடம்" பறிபோகிறது என்றும் புரிகிறது.

சிறுவன் ஒருவனுக்கு கடை ஊழியரால் ஓர் அநீதி இழைக்கப்படுகிறது. அதைப்படம்பிடித்து வயதானவர், ஊடகம், பிரசார பீரங்கிகள் என்று அனைவரும் காசாக்குகிறார்கள். ஓர் ஊடக சர்ச்சைக்கு நடுவே ஒருவர் பிரச்சனையின் அடித்தளமான சாதியை பேச முற்படும்பொழுதெல்லாம் விளம்பர இடைவேளைக்காக அவரை நிறுத்திவிடுகிறார்கள். பிரச்சனையை நிறைவு செய்ய கடை முதலாளி உபயோகப்படுத்தும் யுக்தி கிட்டத்தட்ட நாம் இன்று சாதியை எதிர்கொள்ளும் விதத்திற்கு சரியான ஒப்பீடு. அடிப்படைப் பிரச்சனையை தீர்வு செய்வதில்லை. அநீதி இழைக்கப்பட்டவனுக்கு பெரிதாக பிரயோஜனமில்லை. நடுவில் மாட்டிக்கொண்டு தவிப்பவர்களுக்கு (கடை ஊழியர்கள்) அவர்களது கதியே தெரியாமல் எப்படியாவது அடிப்படைத் தேவைகள் போகாமலிருந்தால் போதும் என்று இருந்துவிடுகிறார்கள்.

சிறுவர்களின் உலகத்தை சித்தரிக்கும் கதைகளிலோ திரைப்படங்களிலோ அவர்களுக்கு உரிய முன் மாதிரிகள் இருக்கிறார்களா என்று நான் எப்பொழுதும் தேடுவதுண்டு. இருக்க வேண்டும் என்ற அவசியமில்லை, இல்லையென்றால் படமோ கதையோ மோசமானது என்றும் இல்லை. அனால் அது இருந்தால் தான் அக்கதை முழுமை அடைந்தது போல் எனக்குத் தோன்றும். சின்ன காக்கா முட்டைக்கும் பெரியவனுக்கும் இங்கே பல முன் மாதிரிகள் உள்ளார்கள் - சிறையில் இருக்கும் தகப்பன், சில்லறையே குறியாய் நைனா, சிநேகமான அம்மா, செல்லாக்கசான பல குடிகாரர்கள் என்று பலர் இருந்தாலும் எங்கோ குழந்தை உள்ளம் மாறாத அந்த பழரசமாக அவ்விருவரும் ஆக வேண்டுமெனவே மனம் விரும்புகிறது.

Monday, May 4, 2015

Uttama Villain

Disclaimer: Kamal once told me (and an audience of about 300 other folks) that writing is a muscle and that it needs to be exercised. A cursory glance at the date of the last post will indicate that I’ve ignored my fitness regimen. So I apologize in advance for any upcoming incoherence and inconsistency. There will be spoilers as it will be impossible for me to talk about the film without giving away key plot elements.
___________________________________________________________________
Here is a pastiche of thoughts on what stood out for me in UV.

Mortality
 It’s an idea that hangs so heavy in the air that most of us deal with it through procrastination, trivialization or denial. We all continue to seek that additional opportunity to balance that ledger book of life that shall forever remain unbalanced. The moving finger writes and having writ always believes that it can write some more. But what happens when the finger is asked to come to terms with its own eventual stillness? Will it change what it writes? Uttama Villain ponders such a heavy question that is likely to lose a majority of us still predisposed to the concerns of our mercenary lives. But it is the unique prerogative of an artist to reflect on his own mortality and if possible hold up a mirror (chuckle) to ours.

Legacy
The film starts the artist’s chief concern – a uniquely excusable form of selfishness that sees Manoranjan, an ageing, formulaic star wanting to be remembered not as he is but as he once was. The fact that Manoranjan is played by Kamal allows us to quite easily create our own list of artistic versus commercial successes for Manoranjan. This isn’t simply a Kamal-for-Mano replacement; he is essentially a stand in for Rajini, Mammootty, Mohanlal, Chiranjeevi, Amitabh... ad nauseum. KB takes what many will consider his own spot in the parallel universe but it is interesting to see K.Viswanath cast as the S.P.Muthuraman or Prakash Mehra equivalent.
The art versus commerce dialectic is an often belabored conversation, especially when it comes to Kamal. But the writing in Uthama Villain expands on this in a rather interesting manner. Manohar and Manonmani are clearly stand-ins for the types of audience one begets from the different types of artistic marriages. Marry Yamini (art for art’s sake) and beget a beautiful bob haired beauty who speaks with slight Malayalam accent. Marry a once-attractive-now-corpulent Varalakshmi (the pure commercial) and beget a somewhat mediocre and distant son. Obviously Manonmani has a strained relationship with Manoranjan, but it is interesting to note Manohar’s own shame and resolve to ‘learn scriptwriting’. That to me clearly indicates that Kamal highlighting the artists’ job in cultivating audience taste.

Privacy
The art versus commerce quickly raises the question of the other dichotomy for an actor – the confluence of an intensely internal process and a machine that continuously erodes privacy.  Manoranjan is not in full control of the machine that creates and sustains his celebrity, it is partly in the control of his father-in-law and partly outsourced to Chokku Chetty (M.S.Basker who is as enjoyable on screen as ever) who proves a little unworthy of the trust bestowed upon him. (Digression: Chokku Chetty is a great character by the way – a man whose moral center seems misguided entirely because he comes from a vastly different universe than his employer. He continues to break his employer’s confidence each time with the best intentions – an unwitting Naradar of sorts who makes the film possible.)
And then there are the throwaway dialogs within the film that just continue to reiterate the irony – Manohar’s girlfriend complaining about lack of privacy just as he sees his dad and Arpana together, Chokku Chetty’s “AthukkuthAnE irukku” in reference to the curtain, the callousness of a bystander screaming “Thalaivaa award confirm” as he and his son are tearing up in each other’s arms (a nod to the “if you make your audience cry an award is guaranteed sentiment”).

The film within the film
The stilted performances from Kamal’s last two films are most apparent in the Uttama Villain within the film. But there are a few conscious choices that make the idea interesting; eschewing a film on ‘Adi Sankara’ to make a ‘less commercial’ movie, a king who masquerading as an artist rather than use his army to liberate a neighboring kingdom and the entire IraNiyan play at the end totally worked for me. And considering the number of dualities he tackles in the movie it is especially ironic that he eschews a movie on the man who propounded Advaitam. And Nasser, continually willing to reinvent himself on screen, is quite fantastic. It's hard to believe that the same guy once played Mayan and Badri, until one is reminded of Basha from Avvai Shanmughi.


I will say the film hasn’t come together seamlessly (for me internally) like Kamal’s best fare has in the past, but it’s definitely the most he has given us to mull over in the recent few years and I for one am extremely thankful.